Should choose full RSS feed or summary RSS - Whether you display a full RSS feed or an RSS summary depends on how much you use RSS. To increase search rankings or get information for customers? Here are the pros and cons of summarized and complete RSS feeds
RSS summary feed
When you have an RSS feed for your website, you have the option to display an entire post or a summary with a link back to the website. Many people choose to display summary feeds to entice readers to return to highly commercialized websites. In other words, they want you to click on links, AdSense or other ads in the content of the article.
This is definitely the benefit of summarizing RSS reasons for not having a complete feed via RSS links. Many readers skim through the summary feed and click on other feeds - if you have the full RSS feed, then customers will just glance at it.
Another reason to choose an accurate summary as described above: they skim through feeds and summaries make it easier for you to notice. Some people just check to see if the summaries have something that catches their eye. This is especially true for common topics where aggregated bulk feeds, even if appropriate tags are selected to filter them.
Basically, however, the only real advantage of using RSS summaries is that they tend to generate greater clicks on websites, podcast sites or vlogs (video diaries). If this is important to you, then it is the best option. However, that is not such an advantage.
Full RSS feed
With the full RSS feed, the whole website is aimed at readers. Many full feeds are republished on other websites, so there are links to other pages or yours because full RSS feeds must be republished in full versions and not edited.
You will get important Link Juice, so readers find other pages through your own links. No more than two links or Google to think you spam the link. Then the links should relate to the topic of the post.
Another benefit is that neither for the feed recipient will scan the summary, only the headlines or the whole post. That's when the post gets a new amount of traffic, and every click comes back showing usable traffic - if you know how!
You will benefit from a feed ad: readers will respond to the feed ad in full or at least click on the ad, compared to the first time they had to click to see the post on the website. . In fact, many people will intentionally avoid ads to click on feeds.
You have a list subscription form on the post or a link to it. You have great content for websites and websites that really make a living with this content, from text to video content.
Another benefit of a full feed is that many people, especially those who access the internet using mobile devices, will pay a hefty fee for bandwidth usage. They will then download the feed offline rather than clicking to visit the website.
When you want the feed to be put into the appropriate directories and website lists, not all will summarize RSS. Don't worry too much about losing customers to your website, because people who are interested in the content of the feed will click on your website, especially if they have a comment.
The reason for the full version is the preferred format for republishing is because webmasters to keep visitors longer on the site with a full site post and thus tend to republish the version. The fuller version in leads readers to your site from them.
Conclude
Basically, it's up to you: if you want more clicks from your feed, a summary will get there. Also wanting the importance of Link Link list position placement, a full feed will do more. Often a great feed has what readers want to hide behind that summary, but if they don't want to leave the website to read it, it's hard!
It is not guaranteed to do anything, because it depends on the quality of your website and the services you are providing. However, in terms of balance, it is likely that you will benefit greatly from using full RSS feeds instead of RSS summaries.
Post a Comment
Post a Comment